Mosquitoes are tiny, ectothermic organisms and are highly sensitive to temperature and humidity. Larvae require suitable aquatic habitats, and adults use a variety of natural and human-created structures for resting habitats. However, these environmental relationships vary depending on the mosquito species and the environmental context.
In South Dakota, the abundance of Aedes vexans, a floodwater mosquito increases following heavy rainfall when there is high cover of surface water (Chuang et al. 2011; Chuang et al. 2012). Culex tarsalis, an important vector of West Nile virus, has a weaker relationship with rainfall and a strong relationship with temperature. Aedes vexans is associated with wetland habitats, whereas Culex tarsalis is associated with grassland habitats (Chuang et al. 2011). In Oklahoma, the abundances of Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes albopictus are highest on warm humid days with little precipitation in the previous two weeks (McMahon et al. 2022). Culex quinquefasciatus is most abundant in landscapes with high densities of buildings and roads and Aedes albopictus is most abundant in landscapes with low tree cover
The environmental factors that influence mosquitoes can be mapped and monitored through time using data from Earth observing satellites. These remotely sensed measurements have been shown to perform as well as or better than ground based environmental measurements when developing models of mosquito abundance (Chuang et al. 2012; McMahon et al. 2022). Variation in land cover can create distinctive microclimates that influence the mosquito reproduction, growth, and survival as well as transmission and development rates of mosquito-borne pathognes, creating localized “hot spots” of high disease transmission potential (Wimberly et al. 2020).
- McMahon, A., C. M. B. Franca, and M. C. Wimberly. 2022. Comparing satellite and ground-based measurements of environmental suitability for vector mosquitoes in an urban landscape. Journal of Medical Entomology 59: 1936-1946.
- Wimberly, M. C., J. K. Davis, M. V. Evans, A. Hess, P. M. Newberry, N. Solano-Asamoah, C. C. Murdock. 2020. Land cover affects microclimate and temperature suitability for arbovirus transmission in an urban landscape. PLoS Neglected Tropial Diseases 14(9): e0008614.
- Chuang, T., G. M Henebry, J. S. Kimball, D.L. VanRoekel-Patton, M. B. Hildreth, and M. C. Wimberly. 2012. Satellite microwave remote sensing for environment modeling of mosquito population dynamics. Remote Sensing of Environment 125: 147-156.
- Chuang, T. M. B. Hildreth, M. B., D. L. VanRoekel, and M. C. Wimberly. 2011. Weather and land cover influences on mosquito populations in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Journal of Medical Entomology 48: 669-679.
Ticks are blood-sucking arthropods that can transmit a variety of disease-causing pathogens. These pathogens are typically sustained in enzootic cycles involving multiple host species and transmitted to humans through infected tick bites. We studied the geographic distributions of two tick-borne pathogens, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytiphilum, in the southern United States. The prevalence of these pathogens was associated with multiple climate and land cover variables (Yabsley et al. 2005). However, the most important environmental predictors varied geographically, reflecting distinctive ecological conditions in different parts of the species’ ranges (Wimberly et al. 2008b). A subregional analysis focused on the Mississippi Alluvial Valley found strong effects of forest cover and flooding on the distributions of both pathogens (Manangan et al. 2007). Environmental models that incorporated environmental predictors and accounted for the spatial autocorrelation of pathogen occurrence were developed to predict the regional distributions of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Wimberly et al. 2008a).
- Wimberly, M. C., A. B. Baer, and M. J. Yabsley. 2008a. Enhanced spatial models for predicting the geographic distributions of tick-borne pathogens. International Journal of Health Geographics 7:15.
- Wimberly, M. C., M. J. Yabsley, A. B. Baer, V. G. Dugan, and W. R. Davidson. 2008b. Spatial heterogeneity of climate and land cover constraints on distributions of tick-borne pathogens. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17: 189-202.
- Manangan, J. S., S. H. Schweitzer, N. Nibbelink, M. J. Yabsley, S. E. J. Gibbs, and M. C. Wimberly. 2007. Habitat factors influencing distributions of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia chaffeensis in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 7: 563-574.
- Yabsley, M. J., M. C. Wimberly, D. E. Stallknecht, S. E. Little, and W. R. Davidson. 2005. Spatial analysis of the distribution of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, causative agent of human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis, across a multi-state region. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 72: 840-850.